Actually I've heard this complaint even to day. I know at least one Maxxum 9 shooter who was a little shocked to find that when he printed some film the feet on a subject he was shooting wasn't in the print. Of course he normally left it off the edge in his old camera knowing it would be on the print. He was a little perturbed because he wasn't sure he liked 100% after that. Go figure. Kent Gittings
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Walkden Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:17 PM To: lbparis Subject: Re[2]: Pentax AF viewfinders Hi, how on Earth did they try to justify such as stupid argument? --- Bob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Saturday, October 27, 2001, 4:24:17 PM, you wrote: > Believe it or not, 100% viewfinders used to take a certain > amount of criticism too, years ago. Mainly from people that > used the full frame to compose their pictures and then found > that they couldn't print them on 8 X 10" paper without cropping. > Len > --- - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ********************************************************************** - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
