frank theriault wrote: > On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial >> without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems >> with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering group of PDMLers would >> experience any problems. > > Call me naive, but I agree with you, Paul. > > I can't imagine that the photo cops will be harassing folks with dslrs > taking pix of the Empire State Building. It's obviously aimed at > "film shoots" which attract the attention of passersby and disrupt > traffic. > > I'm also sure that newspapers and other well-funded media outlets will > be chomping at the bit to take a test case to court to test the > constitutionality of this new law. > > cheers, > frank > >
Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use this proposed law on a regular basis to try and prevent people from shooting buildings legally. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
