On 04/07/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Which is good news. An actually available 85/1.4 (although one that is
> inferior to the Pentax SMC-A version), a couple of superb macros, a 35/2
> , a 50 that's not really worth bothering with (While the 50 has been a
> big hit in Nikon-land, that's only because the Nikon 50/1.4 is fairly
> average in performance not because the Zeiss is legendary in its
> performance. I'd rather a Pentax 50/1.4 than the Zeiss) and a superb
> 25/2.8 (which is really the gem of the current Zeiss line of 35mm SLR
> lenses).

At the very least I can see the CZ 50/2 macro replacing a handful of
my Pentax 50mm lenses, so it shouldn't cost too much in the end.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to