De listing a company with large numbers of shares outstanding borders on theft. Doing that may not be legal in some places.
Digital Image Studio wrote: > On 04/07/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Wholly owned must mean something different over there. Here you need 100% of >> the shares. Controlling interest which is what they seem to be talking about >> is somewhat different. >> > > It's a loose interpretation I guess, the latests Pentax press release > indicates that shares may be difficult to trade if the company is > de-listed (which is what is assumed will occur). > > -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
