On 08/07/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For what it cost it's not too bad, but I tend to compare all zooms to > the FA* 80-200, and in that light it's a piece of shit. :-) And even > compared to the FA 28-105 Powerzoom it's not that impressive.
I've thought about getting hold of the Samsung version (pretty inexpensive at Teds) as light knock about lens but I was certainly under no illusion that it would perform as well as my costly primes. I think that the test is fair and the only thing that might really be a bother to me are the strange double image type aberrations that Bill mentioned. It's still great value for the money though. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
