I don't get it. I know several others here have had there photos 'pinched'
from the web and used by others as if they were the photographer. What kind
of person does that? Why would they even get any pleasure when credited for
something they did not do?
I was browsing the nature section of the local newspaper and followed a link
to an area I was interested in. Low and behold, two of my aurora photos
were on a member's site.
&*%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&!!!
I've sent this e-mail to the hosting site and will leave the strongest
possible message on the member's site.
--
Hi there,
I just browsed a members site by following a link from the Idaho Statesman.
I found two of my photos posted on this members site (Sawtooth Sean)
that are not only NOT PHOTOS OF THE LOCATION being described, they are NOT
HIS photos. They are mine and were taken from my home in 2001.
These are the links on the members site:
http://www.summitpost.org/view_object.php?object_id=144353
http://www.summitpost.org/view_object.php?object_id=144354&context_id=155243
They are on my website and have been since 2001 (even though member claims
they were taken in 1998).
http://www.peaceoflight.com/moodlites.htm
http://www.peaceoflight.com/skyfire.htm
The one immediately above was published and credited to me on the inside
cover of Idaho magazine in late 2001/early 2002.
I will leave a post on the members site and I expect these photos to be
removed immediately. Thank you. I would also question the legitimacy and
proper use of any other photos on this members site.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
