It's all part and parcel of the same thing. You perfect the image in post. Huff and puff all you want to, but it's undeniably a part of photography today and for a long time to come. Paul On Jul 13, 2007, at 10:07 PM, William Robb wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Stenquist" > Subject: Re: The Morning Fix > > >> >> On Jul 13, 2007, at 8:30 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: >> >>> >>> Right in camera or not I find myself these days devoting much >>> time to >>> post processing trying to reduce the effects of the limitations >>> of the >>> equipment. If the photographer is perfectly happy remain >>> photographically within the technical bounds of the equipment then >>> that's great for them but for me the resolution, angle of view, >>> dynamic range and distortions can all be improved upon using various >>> post processing techniques. So these days the camera is just my >>> capture device, the serious work happens well after the shot was >>> taken. >> >> Well said. See, we occasionally agree:-). > > There is quite a philosophical difference between overcoming the > limitations > of the equipment with software and overcoming the limitations of a > poorly > executed image with software. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
