Each person has to get their own style and flow. No software product is for everyone. Lightroom wasn't the tool for me on two counts. First, it was rather slow - especially compared to other raw converters. Second, it is much more than just a raw converter (may contribute to slowness) and I already have several tools to deal with organization, gallery creation, client ordering, etc. So it just doesn't work ideally for me.
-- Bruce Saturday, July 14, 2007, 8:21:22 PM, you wrote: PS> Try as I might, I can't get used to lightroom. I still prefer ACR by PS> a wide margin. I find the adjustments by click in lightroom to be far PS> too coarse. And the categories seemed to be aimed at amateurs. PS> Clarity and vibrance? What does that mean. In ACR, I know what PS> contrast, brightness, exposure and shadows mean. Lightroom is a PS> puzzle. I don't think I'm going to go that way. Maybe I'm missing a PS> lot. Perhaps I haven't given it a fair chance. But ACR is now second PS> nature to me. I don't see that Lightroom would become as close an PS> ally for a long time to come. PS> Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
