Well, if it's about the dog, crop in on the dog. I would take off 1/4 to 1/3 on the right and at the top, at least.
Rick --- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Someone is watching ... > > > > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/32c.htm > > > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > > There's all sorts of reasons not to like this one, > but I do. > > I initially looked at the other comments, saw they > were somewhat > mixed, and perhaps was prejudiced somewhat by that > (I usually look > unfettered by the biases of other comments). > > I think I was somewhat affected by the title. I > opened it, saw no one > looking at each other, or at the camera. What the > hell's this about, > then? > > Then I saw the dog. Looking through the chairbacks. > They were a distraction. > > Then I kept looking, at the dog, at his expression. > The photo grew on me. > > Now I like it. I like it very much. > > I agree with Cotty. > > cheers, > frank > > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri > Cartier-Bresson > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW ____________________________________________________________________________________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
