I agree that teaching BW photography as a fine art is worthwhile. I  
too have kept my darkroom and plan to spend some time there again.  
However, general photography and commercial photography should be  
taught in terms of a digital workflow.
Paul
On Aug 5, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:

> These courses are about B&W film photography and taught in the art
> department.  We have two brand new darkrooms that accommodate 16, also
> in the art dept.  I've had some nice talks with the new photography
> professor, and she sees B&W film persisting indefinitely as an art
> supply.  I'm not surprised that film-based courses are going away as
> "technical" subjects  but they are becoming popular in art depts. at
> schools that are not looking to squeeze every dime.  This includes  
> many
> of the private undergraduates colleges like mine.  The course is  
> really
> popular, as is the digital photography course also offered in art.   
> The
> presence of film in mainstream photography is diminishing but I don't
> see B&W film ever completely going away anymore than oil paints.  If
> anything, it is getting more of a cachet as an artistic technique.
>
> As an aside, I took so long to respond to this because I can't seem to
> send posts to the list from the internet connection at my house.  I  
> have
> no idea why.  I have to wait until I come into my office.
>
>>>> "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/3/2007 1:34 PM >>>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Desjardins"
> Subject: Re: FID (Film is Dead)
>
>
>> Film (at least B&W) still lives on in college photography courses.
> Big
>> new darkrooms and a long waiting list of students.  The new
> photography
>> professor told me that last year she got the first group with
> students
>> that had never used film.  Of course, they use mostly K1000s.
>
> Is that your college specifically or are film courses generally
> available?
> Our local tech college is no longer offering film anything.
> As much as I appreciate and enjoy working with film, I see it as being
> more
> of an an appendix to a college of arts than anything else at this
> point.
> It's use by professional photographers is pretty much over at this
> point (I
> suspect Clint Clements is still using it, and this will be trotted out
> as
> proof of universal usage), the pro boys where I am are 100% digital
> now.
>
> William Robb
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
> !SIG:46b36b6a117328588214762!
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to