Apertures used notwithstanding, to my eye the 16~50 image is somewhat sharper than either the 16~45 or 28~70 and virtually equal to the 31. I know, an absolutely meaningless observation.
Jack --- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In case anyone is interested there is a set of sample images and > discussions on DPR > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=24258250 > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
