frank theriault wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Daniel J. Matyola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have just returned from two weeks in Eastern Canada, and I observed
>> a lot of flags in the various provinces up there.
>>
>> In Europe, some countries -- like Switzerland, Norway and Denmark --
>> seem to fly their national flags even more than we flag-waving
>> Americans do.  In other countries, like Germany and Italy, the
>> national flags are rarely seen.
>>
>> Canada seems to be full of flags.  In the Maritime provinces, the
>> provincial flag is usually flown beside the national flag.  In Quebec,
>> however, the blue and white provincial flag is everywhere, but the red
>> and white Canadian flag was quite rare.  Most provincial government
>> buildings were flying only the flag of Quebec, without the Canadian
>> flag, mostly of national government buildings and tourist hotels.  I
>> can't imagine a state office building in New Jersey or New York flying
>> only the state flag without causing a considerable controversy.
>>
>> Also, on the West coast of Cape Breton, I saw a lot of "Acadian"
>> flags, but was not really certain of what they mean or why they seemed
>> pretty much restricted to that area.


> Okay, I agree with much of what both Adam and Dave said, however, the
> issue of Quebec "nationhood" is quite complex will not be simply dealt
> with in a forum like this.
> 
> Ever since confederation in 1867, there were those in Quebec that felt
> that it should be an independant nation.
> 
> The numbers of true separatists have tended to be fairly constant over
> the years;  depending on who one asks, the number is around 25%.
> However, depending on how and when one asks the question of
> separation, anywhere from 25% to up to 60% will seem to be in
> agreement.
> 
> Bottom line is that many in Quebec think of it as a "nation" - not in
> the sense of an independant nation-state, but in terms of a defined
> geographical area within which on can find a unique culture, language,
> etc.  There's a sense of "dual nationhood", by which one can consider
> one's self both Canadian and Quebecois, and one's "primary" allegiance
> (if that's the right word) may well be towards Quebec.
> 
> Even though Quebec's current government is not separatist (there have
> been a number of them over the years), due to the influence of
> separatists in the media and educational institutions, the sense that
> one's a Quebecker before being a Canadian is maintained.  Therefore,
> provincial government buildings, for instance, will fly the provincial
> flag and not a Canadian flag.
> 
> I know it's kinda weird, especially with the American concept of
> nationhood, and many in English Canada don't understand it, but in
> Quebec, I suspect that most understand what's going on, even if not
> all accept it.
> 
> As for the Acadians, I'll answer Adam's post directly...
> 
> cheers,
> frank

Very good answer, Frank! Thanks...

keith whaley

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to