I don't know what you've been reading, but the P645's A35/3.5 and A45/2.8 lenses seem very good performers in my experience. They're all I've used with the P645 and I have no problems at all with the quality they produce.
Godfrey On Aug 11, 2007, at 2:01 AM, Matt Johnson wrote: > So after over 6 months of shooting with my 67ii, I'm already > considering getting a 645 as a compliment to it, while I love my 67, > I'm thinking a 645 would pick up slack in some areas like portability > . After looking into getting a macro for my 67, and hearing how good > the 120 was on the 645, I realized I could start up a 645 system much > easier than getting that 100mm for the 67. > > My thoughts are leaning towards the 645 replacing the LX in th camera > bag as far as my street, handheld, and macro photography go.with the > ability to share lenses am I crazy for wanting to eliminate the 35mm > film out of the backpack. (I do still carry my digital anyway) > > So my question really comes down to which body and lenses. I was > hoping to get some informative ideas for some of you 645 guys on here. > > Also heres some of the ideas i've been tossing around so you get an > idea what im thinking... > I was thinking that the N is the best choice features to price wise, > although I've read about the film flatness issue. Also I haven't read > anything conclusive as to what lenses are good/bad choices. for the > 645, I was thinking something in th 35-45 range but heard mixed things > on those lenses, definitely the 120 macro, maybe something like a > 75mm.( or maybe the 90 for my 67 with a converter) For long telephoto > i could go 67 and use the converter getting even more length. oh btw > i currently have the 45 and 165 LS for my 67. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
