I have many levels of suckiness. Cheers,
Dave On 8/14/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You suck even more than I thought possible... > > David Savage wrote: > > On 8/14/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Kenneth Waller" > >> Subject: Re: 300mm 2.8 AF: Sigma vs Pentax > >> > >> > >> > >>> FWIW - > >>> > >>> I have the FA 300mm f4.5, Its a wonderful lens even if it doesn't have a > >>> tripod mount. > >>> > >>> Unless you absolutely, positively need the extra light a 2.8 aperture > >>> provides, I find it very hard to justify the extra cost of the 2.8 300mm > >>> over the 4.5 300mm. > >>> > >> Which 300/4.5 do I have? It must be the F. Mine has a tripod mount, and is > >> wonderfully small, smaller than my FA200/4 macro. > >> > > > > I have the FA version: > > > > <http://picasaweb.google.com/OzSavage/Misc/photo?authkey=TrIZRqTedfw#5096341721848299026> > > > > It's the one on the left. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
