True. (I am not ashamed to admit I am only a beginner.) Sorry for the
background. However, the animal itself shows more of its identity to
the viewer than in your picture. Anyone can see this is a butterfly.
Experts could tell what kind of butterfly. Maybe even if it is happy.
The other picture leaves us guessing. Maybe that is intentionally.
However, even that we don't know.

Syb

2007/8/14, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The bug isn't chopped in half like my version. The background is a little 
> busy.
>
>
> On 8/14/07, syb vis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So we were at Artis, the Amsterdam Zoo. There I shot a lot of empty
> > leaves, and one successful liftoff...
> >
> > http://fotodag.fotopic.net/p44085856.html
> >
> >
> > Comments are always welcomed. I may learn from them, or decide to
> > ignore them. Feel free to contribute!
> >
> > Syb
> >
> > --
> > ========================
> > Syb Vis, The Netherlands.
> > "Since i bought my DSLR, i do no longer buy prints. Instead, i pay
> > digital frames. Who said it would become cheaper?"
> >
> > =================================
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
> --
> Toine
> http://leende.net
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
========================
Syb Vis, The Netherlands.
"Since i bought my DSLR, i do no longer buy prints. Instead, i pay
digital frames. Who said it would become cheaper?"

=================================

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to