I agree with Ken, like the first crop, but only for what is in the frame. The second, yes, is processed 100X better. Good going, you're getting it. Looking much, much better.
Marnie :-) ============= My first attempt at dealing with this rather difficult exposure situation was so embarrassing, I shudder when I look at it. Here's another (I think more successful) attempt: http://tinyurl.com/39a6gq http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RsBXBrMIuRI/AAAAAAAAAkY/dj8ARi2eVvE/s1600- h/aug_13+005.jpg For comparison, here's the original: http://tinyurl.com/22mplu http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RrS6XLMIt4I/AAAAAAAAAhQ/hV-8FRtnsFc/s1600- h/sk8r.jpg As you see, I also tried a different crop. Any thoughts? Same old same old, or do you think it's an improvement? Am I at least on the right path here? thanks for your thoughts, frank --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
