> > I'm rather torn on this concept of "good art". > > One one hand, it seems to me that it's hard to "grade" art. Either > one likes it or one doesn't, and because there are so many reasons to > like it, it's hard to quantify.
you can like one thing better than another, and there's no reason why you shouldn't say so. Then you've graded it. > Something can be both repulsive and > compelling. Something can be "pretty" (see Trisha Romance's stuff) > and banal. > > In fact, is her stuff even art? > > I don't know. > It doesn't matter whether it's art or not. The important thing about it is that it's shit, and you shouldn't be afraid to say so. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
