Mark Roberts wrote: > Tom C wrote: > > >> Native ISO of 200 is a little disappointing. Would have preferred 100 >> > or > >> 50. >> > > >From looking at the specs, I'd say it's probably more of a > sports/action camera - a competitor for the Canon 1D rather than 1Ds. > And putting "only" 12 megapixels in full-frame sensor should > theoretically yield very low noise at ISO 200. But doesn't lower noise mean a higher ISO? Or have I missed something?
(I'm of course referring to the actual ISO rating of the sensor itself, not the "ISO" setting.) > At least, I'm sure this > is how Nikon is hoping things work out. They've really taken their time > with this one so there's a good chance they've got it right. (But Dave > Brooks will probably still not buy one!) > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
