The Pro version didn't even make it to the mock-up stage. Cheers,
Norm. On 8/25/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That article is just plain abusive, referring to the mockup as a "dummy > version". > > Tom C. > > >From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority' > >Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:18:28 +1000 > > > >On 24/08/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported... > > > >Wasting bandwidth or your time am I? > > > >-- > >Rob Studdert > >HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > >Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > >http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > >Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
