Jack,
If you do go back, maybe you could include a bit more of the upper bridge?
Regards,  Bob S.

On 8/27/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like it has lots of potential.  As is, the lighting isn't
> helping and the sky is a wash.  It is something to revisit, if you
> can, and capture the great image that is lurking.
>
> --
> Bruce
>
>
> Monday, August 27, 2007, 7:01:36 AM, you wrote:
>
> JD> On our (wife and I) way to the coast to escape the Northern California
> JD> central valley heat, I did a U-turn and a quick hand held grab of the
> JD> attached.
> JD> After walking a short ways, I went to f/5.6 in order to give SR a
> JD> chance. As a result, I recognize that the DoF is fairly shallow.
> JD> Didn't thrill me through the viewfinder, but guess it's my barn thing
> JD> that kept me from deleting it.
>
> JD> Jack
>
> JD> http://www.photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=231
>
> JD> K10D, DA 16~45, f/5.6, 100 ISO
>
> JD> comments, of course, welcome
>
>
>
> JD> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> JD> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
> JD> Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
> JD> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to