Scott, I'd go for a 67. 6x7 with mirror lock-up is a minimum. I like the 165/2.8 lens, but I think the 105/2.4 is the better in your normal range. You know there are a full complement of lenses, finders, and gadgets for these cameras. You are embarking on major league enablement. Regards, Bob S.
On 8/27/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I'm toying with the possibility of selling the K10, I'm also > considering where I'm going to sink the money. One of my options is a > 67 with one (count 'em, 1) lens. I got a couple questions. I recall > reading somewhere (probably this very list) that the 67 body is a better > option than a 6x7. Newer, more likely to be repairable, etc. Would > someone mind confirming that for me? Also, I'm looking at a normal lens > to go with it. SMC Takumar 105/2.4, SMC 105/2.4 or SMC 90/2.8? Any > opinions? Thanks! > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
