I would send it to Colorado for service, along with some examples of the noise 
problems. 
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> They were brand new lithium AA's.  Crumby, huh?
> 
> 
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
> >From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: I Hate My *ist D - Eclipse Photos
> >Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:57:32 -0500
> >
> >Were you running it off batteries or ac power adaptor?
> >
> >On 8/28/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I hate my *ist D.  I stayed up until 5:15 AM taking eclipse photos.  The
> > > first several within 20 minutes of when the eclipse started look OK, 
> >though
> > > that was not the fabulous part of the evening(morning).  However, the 
> >camera
> > > quickly became noisy (electronic noise), even at short exposures ISO 400 
> >and
> > > 1/500 sec.  All with Tokina 500 f/8 mirror lens.
> > >
> > > Of course it was at its absolute worst during totality.  One shot for 
> >some
> > > reason was less noisy than the others, though still ruined by noise 
> >(next to
> > > the last as presented).
> > >
> > > http://photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=355756
> > >
> > > Most shots looked good on the LCD, even when magnified to check focus, 
> >with
> > > orange hues and turquoise tones at the edge of earths shadow.  All lost 
> >to
> > > noise.
> > >
> > > Some taken during totality didn't make muster because 8 - 10 sec 
> >exposures
> > > were too long and exhibited too much tracking across the frame.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if I have a hardware problem with the camera... may be time 
> >to
> > > throw it in the trash.  I've taken other aurora shots with the same body
> > > that were virtually noise free at exposures of 15 - 20 seconds. The 
> >newer
> > > *ist DS with less than 1000 shots on it was even worse, however, at ISO 
> >800
> > > and 2 secs.  Images (not shown here) were absolutely obliterated. Looked
> > > like a Photoshop effect.
> > >
> > > Still amazing to watch.
> > >
> > > Tom C.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to