Bob, I wasn't aware the A version was so rare and pricey for the 35/2. I never seriously looked for a 35 when I was still shooting K mount.
-Adam Bob Sullivan wrote: > Adam, > If you know where I could find one of those A35/2.0 lenses, I'd like > to know. I've only seen one or two in the past 5 years and they were > over $300 each. I'd like to find one now. The M35/2.0 is cheaper and > more available. > Regards, Bob S. > > On 8/28/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I was recommending the A version of the 35/2, if only for >> future-proofing your lenses. The 40/2.8 is only available in M or DA >> Limited versions and the latter will only function in P and Tv modes on >> your Super Program, rendering it less than useful(it remains the sole DA >> lens to fully cover 35mm, making it quite usable on a PZ or *ist film body). >> >> -Adam >> >> >> >> >> Glen Tortorella wrote: >>> Thanks, Adam. With regard to the 40/2.8, I thought you were >>> recommending the A 40/2.8 lens? KEH has these in the M-series. >>> >>> Glen >>> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
