You can distinguish the two 55/4s by the placement of the lens designation 
type. On the later, prefered version, the type appears on a chamfer on the end 
of the focus ring. Just like an A series lens f or Pentax 35mm. I have this 
lens as well and love it. 
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have a 6x7 with MLU, but no metering. I've had no problem getting it 
> serviced - one of the old camera repair outfits in the area has a good 
> supply of 6x7 parts on hand and the guy there loves to work on them.
> 
> WRT lenses - I've been very happy with the 67 55mm f4, Takumar 105 f 2.8 
> and 150 f2.8.  The 45 would be a nice addition as well.
> 
> WRT 55mm lenes - there were 3 of them made for the 6x7 / 67. The 67 55mm 
> f4 is outstanding. The 6x7 55mm f4 is not. I originally had the latter 
> and sold it - it was a weird lens in that some shots were fabulous, but 
> others had really bad distortion in the corners and edges. Be careful 
> when buying because the lenses have the same basic specs (55m, f4, 77mm 
> front objective.)
> 
> The third 55mm is an f3.5 and is the oldest of the batch - it generally 
> gets great reviews but has a big and odd sized front element, so filters 
> could be a problem.
> 
> - MCC
> 
> 
> Scott Loveless wrote:
> > Since I'm toying with the possibility of selling the K10, I'm also 
> > considering where I'm going to sink the money.  One of my options is a 
> > 67 with one (count 'em, 1) lens.  I got a couple questions.  I recall 
> > reading somewhere (probably this very list) that the 67 body is a better 
> > option than a 6x7.  Newer, more likely to be repairable, etc.  Would 
> > someone mind confirming that for me?  Also, I'm looking at a normal lens 
> > to go with it.  SMC Takumar 105/2.4, SMC 105/2.4 or SMC 90/2.8?  Any 
> > opinions?  Thanks!
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Mark Cassino Photography
> Kalamazoo, Michigan
> www.markcassino.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to