The second is a vast improvement over the first, but my original thought still holds. Some shots just don't lend themselves to conversion.
David Savage wrote: > On 9/1/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Without a before & after it's hard to say but I'd still like to be able to >> see more detail on the horse. >> > > Good point :-) > > Before: > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/_IGP5180_1.jpg> > > After: > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/_IGP5180.jpg> > > Colour: > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/_IGP5180_colour.jpg> > > I think I need some sleep & and have another go when I'm rested. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
