> Since numerous Pentax lenses have been made by 3rd parties any way, it > wouldn't seem to matter that much, IMO. Shhh. That's supposed to be a secret.
Tom Cakalic wrote: > I don't really forsee that people would use the gallery to determine > which lenses produced what image, even though it might be of interest > to a few. I suspect that if Pentax is using this gallery as an > advertising tool, what they're looking for most is eyepopping pretty > pictures of what ever genre. > > Since numerous Pentax lenses have been made by 3rd parties any way, it > wouldn't seem to matter that much, IMO. > Tom C. > > >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery rules >> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:05:37 -0400 >> >> This seems bizarre since I would think that Pentax would want to >> highlight it's lenses... >> >> Bruce Dayton wrote: >> > In running through some of the photos today (voting), I came across >> > two photos that were not shot with Pentax lenses. The person(s) who >> > uploaded had clearly indicated that the lens in one was a Sigma >> > 180/3.5 Macro and the other a Voigtlander 125/2.5. >> > >> > So I looked at the rules again and they only state that it must be >> > shot with a Pentax SLR - nothing about lenses. I seem to remember in >> > the beginning that the lens must be Pentax. Now it seems that you >> > don't have to use a Pentax lens. >> > >> > That would make a big difference for me, all my shots from the Tokina >> > 400, all my sports shots and macro shots have been excluded til now. >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Remember, it’s pillage then burn. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
