Rebekah wrote: > I saw some Ebay, and I didn't know what it was, so I was just curious > if it was any good. :o) thanks mucho > Actually, if it's the 100 ISO version of the 400UC I used a couple of years ago, which didn't strictly speaking have "Portra" printed on the box, I'd expect it to be rather good, popular or not.
- T > rg2 > > On 9/3/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Rebekah wrote: >> >>> Any opinions on Kodak Portra 100UC? >>> >>> >>> rg2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Doesn't exist anymore. Or rather, Kodak isn't making it anymore. >> Portra comes in 160 and 400, NC (natural color) or VC (vivid color). >> There's also a Portra 800 for low light. Portra 100UC wasn't the most >> popular of the Portra family when it was in production. But I've never >> used it. If you have some, try it out and see for yourself. Can't hurt. >> >> -- >> Scott Loveless >> http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
