I have no experience of the 4-5.6/28-105 but it is indeed made by Tamron - which in itself is not so bad. I have had the 4.0/28-70 which is, however, as very good lens so I doubt that the 28-105 will not be as good. If you need longer and wider reach, I would recommend the 3.5-4.5/24-90 - a lens I really like and IMO even slightly sharper than the 28-70. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Heiko Hamann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 04. marraskuuta 2001 12:59 Aihe: SMC-FA 4/28-70 vs. SMF-FA 4-5,6/28-105IF >Hi, > >the primary lens for my MZ-5n is my SMC-FA 4/28-70 as it is very compact >an sufficient to my everyday needs. Now I'm offered a SMC-FA 4-5,6/28- >105 to a fair price. The main advantage that I see is the inner focus >(IF) which makes it easier to use filters. > >Has anyone already compared these lenses and can give my an advice? Is >the 28-105 sharper? I also heard, that the 28-105 is produced by Tamron. >Is this true? And if it is true - is this good or bad news?? > >Regards, Heiko - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
