> > From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/09/04 Tue PM 05:26:31 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Stupid lens survery > > You argue pro cat stew. > So I don't take you seriously.
Mark! > > > Tim Typo > Mostly Harmless > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 6:23 PM > Subject: Re: Stupid lens survery > > > On 9/4/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But I'm not sure if I'd go the Pentax route again, judging from what I see > > in the horison now. I love the K10D. I love my FA* 85, I'm also sure I'll > > love the two fast DA* zooms. But where is the long lens lineup? The > > 200/2,8 > > and 300/4 will not fill the gap for me. I need something longer. A 400/ > > would be a lot better. My K-500/4,5 has way too much CA to do what I > > really > > would like to do. In practical use it is an f:8. It is a lot better than > > nothing, but far from what I'd like. And the really flexible and good > > legacy > > lenses are far too expensive at the moment. > > I know for a fact if all my kit was stolen or destroyed tomorrow, and > I had to start all over again, Pentax wouldn't be my first, or second, > choice. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 03.09.2007 > 09:31 > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
