>Without using a tripod, you're cutting your maximum resolution by a >factor of at least 50%. Even at 1/500 second exposure time.
>This is not be important for many types of photographs, but for >others it is a very important factor. I use a tripod a LOT of the time. >Godfrey >"My sharpest lens is a sturdy tripod." Fine, YOU go up to my mother-in-law's house and ask her for my tripod. :oP rg2 On 9/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without using a tripod, you're cutting your maximum resolution by a > factor of at least 50%. Even at 1/500 second exposure time. > > This is not be important for many types of photographs, but for > others it is a very important factor. I use a tripod a LOT of the time. > > Godfrey > "My sharpest lens is a sturdy tripod." > > > > On Sep 6, 2007, at 8:32 AM, Rebekah wrote: > > > ... I have to disagree > > with the advice about a tripod. I haven't been able to find my tripod > > for two years, and so I haven't used it. I take pictures at 1/4s and > > still like them. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
