Yes, some are worth more. I don't know which lens you're referring to so I don't know if it's a nut job or for real...
Rebekah wrote: > I saw a lens on Ebay for a 67 camera listed at almost $1000. Is that > for real? ouch. > rg2 > > > On 9/7/07, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Gonz, >> So you got that one! Good searching techniques. >> Regards, Bob S. >> >> On 9/7/07, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Congrats Mark, but I beat you to the 0.5 brotherhood. My lensless 67 >>> body arrived on Wed. I'm hunting for a lens now too. Mine is a >>> non-metered prism beast, but I paid only $165 for it. >>> >>> On 9/7/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> My eBay'ed Pentax 67 arrived yesterday. >>>> >>>> Even though I've handled one before, I had to laugh when I picked it >>>> up. That thing is huge! (And I won't have a lens for it until next >>>> week!) I felt like I was in a cartoon or something ;-) except that I >>>> would think cartoon cameras are much lighter. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
