http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=331054 (I forgot the link in previous post. Sorry about that)
This is an interesting comment Peter. And coming from you makes it even more intersting. This, because I have many times found your renderings a bit odd. There are detailes in them, but my eye has trouble reading them, if you get the general idea. Either you and I see things very differently, or we have very different monitors. Or, perhaps a third alternative? I'dunno. Do you, or others? This said. There are differenses in the renderings a my monitor too, but not as big as your comment suggests. I know that I don't have a superb monitor. It's an old tired CTR, but it _is_ callibrated, and the blacks seem pretty good after callibration. This puzzles me, a lot. I think I'll ask the rest of the crew. Do you see what Peter does here? If many does, then I deffinatly need to do something with my setup. Tim Typo Moslty Harmless ----- Original Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 4:54 PM Subject: Re: PESO Challenger (unreversed, b&w and colour version) Seems you really did a lot of work on the revised version, since I see no detail at all in the unrevised version... Tim Øsleby wrote: > First thanks for all commenteds. > Raving positive comments, less positive and negative are all appreciated. > Positive makes me fell good, and negative kickes me further. > > Bruce and Charles expressed curiosoty about the unreversed splashes. How > it > looked before reversing them. > Here is the colour version, and a a b&w version, both with unreversed > splashes. Just click at the thumbs below the image. > I've reversed second and third splash, but IMO it's the third that makes > the > differense. > > As I said. I'm not convinced this is the perfect rendering. I had troubles > smoothening the water, without making the bird disappear in the shadows. > All > tonal, cropping and sharpening work are done within Lightroom. Only the > reversing part in Elements. > > So ideas are very appreciated. > > Tim Typo > Mostly Harmless > > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
