Not sure if it was Bruce or Paul S but one of themhad the 80-320 and those pictures looked pretty good.
I think very highly of the Sigma 300F4. Dave On 9/10/07, Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > My professional work does not really require anything longer than my > 28-105 or 135mm lenses but ever so often I wished I had something > longer. I had a Sigma 55-200 for a while but I sold that one. I was > thinking of getting the DA 50-200 but I would like to use it on my > film bodies as well so why not something like the FA J 75-300? My > problem is I could never really get my hands on one (there's none in > the Philippines; have to get it online) to test it and it does suffer > bad rep for being 'cheap' so I wonder how bad it really is. > > Your thoughts? Is that a waste of time and should I get something > like the FA 80-320 (there's a couple of old stocks floating around > locally)? Or, maybe even Sigma's or Tamron's 70-300? Their prices > float around $150... > > Bong > -- > Bong Manayon > http://www.bong.uni.cc > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
