> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38a.htm
Interesting commentary on this one so far. Thank you! From: drayton cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > As Desi used to say, "'splain it to me, Lucy...!" You ARE serious, > I suppose. > You ARE serious, I suppose. From: Steve Barbour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> As Desi used to say, "'splain it to me, Lucy...!" > well 'splain it to me.. is that a person or a giant red pepper with > hair...? > hmmmm... From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This one just doesn't quite work for me. I guess on issue is the > relative size of the head and body seem odd - the head looks small and > that makes the body look overly large. Or it could be that there is > not much room in the frame to show movement direction and the person > is almost out of the frame already. Some thoughts: Photographs can be more than representational, sharp, classical documentaries of things, events and people. I found the warm tones, the softness, shapes, and the suggestion of motion in this photograph somewhat akin to various notions of romantic impressionism in painting. It's successful to my eye, I like the feel and the emotion of it, but whether there's something in it that can be seen by your eyes is what I'm looking for in posting it for critique and commentary. I've discovered in the course of showing my work both to galleries and in gallery exhibitions that many art buyers are drawn to photographs that might not pop to my eye at first. Their interests have pushed me to see photographs in ways apart from simply the perspective of a "good photograph" in the Kodak sense.... From: Steven Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I don't know, seems a tad over-sharpened... ;-) LOL!!! Thanks for all your thoughts. best, Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
