The logic of your statement is that there is no definition of art, or beauty, that is not entirely subjective.
Is that qualitative judgment, "in the eye of the beholder", a product of nature or nurture? G On Sep 13, 2007, at 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It is, of course, in the eye of the beholder. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> What is "sheer beauty"? >> >> G >> >> On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Good pictures come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes it's the >>> compositon that makes a shot memorable. But a fascinating subject >>> can achieve that as well. And of course sheer beauty is always >>> worth a second look. In truth, there is no single, narrow >>> definition. >>> Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
