I guess at that point it'd be shitty art. rg2
On 9/13/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14/09/2007, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > People keep confusing the question of "is it art?" with "is it any > > good?". They're separate issues. > > Of course it can concurrently be art and a dog shit but practically > I'd tend towards labeling it the latter if that's what it is. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- "the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition" -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
