That's why the test of time is critical. Works that are appreciated and applauded over the centuries earn the right to be called art. Nothing current can rightfully claim that title until generations have arrived at a consensus opinion. Almost all serious art critics would agree. One can express an opinion of recent works, but one can never be certain. Paul On Sep 13, 2007, at 8:29 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Much modern art is a scam, just so much crap, (oh after my last post > that's poignant). Drivel that's passed off as "Art" is simply a method > of separating people with more money than brains, and that includes > museum boards, from that excess of money > > Mark Roberts wrote: >> Digital Image Studio wrote: >> >> >>> On 14/09/2007, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>>> What I say is art, IS art. >>>>> >>>> If it has a frame around it. >>>> >>> I say a dog shit with a frame around it is still a dog shit. >>> >> >> People keep confusing the question of "is it art?" with "is it any >> good?". They're separate issues. >> >> >> > > > -- > Remember, it’s pillage then burn. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
