I wouldn't be shocked to hear that's true, a lot of Eisenstaedt's work was posed, especially the early work. But that's one of the few shots by him that doesn't seem lifeless to me, so it may well be a candid.
-Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > BTW, I remember reading that Eisenstaedt's Times Square smooch was staged. > True? Apparently the writer of the article doesn't think so. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Yeah, I feel a Leica moment coming on. My IIIf needs shutter exercise >> anyway. >> Now if I can just find that Tri-X in the back of the freezer. It's all Bob's >> fault:-). >> Paul >> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >> From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> On 9/19/07, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/09/24/070924fa_fact_lane/ >>>> >>> It's not a "real" Leica (being that the body, while designed in >>> Wetzlar, was made by Minolta in Japan), but I really must pull out my >>> CL and take it for a walk. >>> >>> Thanks for a terrific read, Bob! >>> >>> cheers, >>> frank >>> >>> -- >>> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
