Scott Loveless wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  > I played with one in my friend's studio. It's definitely a Leica. 
> (And the price is a dead giveaway:-). However, I don't think it will 
> hold its value in the way most Leica's do. Like all digital cameras, it 
> will be a victim of immature technology.
>  > Paul
> 
> The guys on the LUG list really love them.  Surprisingly, there are 
> quite a few posts about random odd failures.  This tends to generate 
> flame wars with one side claiming a body that expensive ought to be damn 
> near perfect, and the other claiming it's worth the hassle due the 
> unmatched superiority of the images they get.  I don't see much over 
> there that's better than the typical PESO around here - technically or 
> artistically.
> 
> I'm guessing on this one, but there are probably more K10D owners 
> subscribed to the PDML than there are M8 owners subscribed to the LUG. 
> They have quite a few more "broken camera" posts than we do.  Makes me 
> kinda proud.
> 
> I have to agree with you about the price.  Once the next model comes 
> out, undoubtedly with many fixes that should have been implemented with 
> the M8, prices will drop significantly.
> 

Well, the sensor ain't anything to write home about, but it does seem to be a 
nice handling camera, and more reliable than the Epson RD-1 (Which is a flaky 
bitch of a camera, and the only competition the M8 had)

-Adam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to