I'll bet that with lenses support accessories memory etc you could hit 100k pretty quickly. While the idea that most 35mm movie equipment may be overpriced has struck me, the fact that this is so, so much less expensive would give most purchasers pause, after all a digital still camera is more expensive than the film equivalent, how can this be so cheap?
Brendan MacRae wrote: > I believe the body alone is only around $18KUS. > > -Brendan > --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> If you have to ask, you can't afford it. >> >> Charles Robinson wrote: >> >>> On Sep 20, 2007, at 7:00, mike wilson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> This operation was brought up some time ago. I >>>> >> asked than and ask >> >>>> now, "If they can buffer 24fps indefinitely, how >>>> >> come we are stuck >> >>>> with a measly dozen or so at maybe 2fps?" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Answer: Because no individual DSLR owner wants to >>> >> pay what it would >> >>> cost, nor carry what it would weigh! >>> >>> (That's my best guess anyways) >>> >>> I didn't read the article, but what does equipment >>> >> with that kind of >> >>> capabilities cost? >>> >>> -Charles >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Minneapolis, MN >>> http://charles.robinsontwins.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Remember, it’s pillage then burn. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who > knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
