On 9/22/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No matter how heretical this sounds, but you could've taken the moon > with more pixels and paste it on top of the full size picture. I think > moon needs to be a scosh ;-) bigger.
G'day Boris, I should have tried a few with the FA* 80-200 f2.8 I had with me to try and isolate the hook & moon, but I was on the company clock & didn't have the time to fully explore the scene's potential. With regards to your heretical suggestion, it's a good one & I did consider it, but at that point I'd already "Photoshoped" it enough. Thanks for looking & commenting. Cheers, Dave > David Savage wrote: > > Small (535x800 pix, ~115kb): > > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP6957_sml.jpg> > > > > Large (800x1200 pix, ~215kb): > > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP6957_lrg.jpg> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
