Also I've been playing around with Gran Paradiso (aka Firefox 3.0 alpha 1). It does support colour profiles. Here is a quick test I did comparing Firefox 2 & 3:
Firefox 2.0.0.7 (~240kb) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/FF2CMtest.jpg> Firefox 3.0a9Pre with colour management enabled (it's off by default) (~250kb) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/FF3CMtest.jpg> The test .jpg's were made direct from ACR, 8 bit & colour profile as indicated. Cheers, Dave On 9/23/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/23/07, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Off topic, but important for many people here, I think: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/darknesis/1424292900/ > > > > Obviously, color profiles play a huge role in how your images are viewed > > online. This is a good illustration of the problem. > > > > John > > (removes profile info before uploading, but would much rather display in > > Adobe RGB) > > A simple convert to sRGB before uploading would solve the problem. > > Until every web user is using a web browser that supports colour > profiles, sRGB is the only way to go. > > Cheers, > > Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
