John Graves wrote: > Mike, > > If only the world worked the way we think it should. My brother found > the obit in the Boston Public Library as a microfilm copy of the paper. > The Library doesn't retain newspapers after they have been microfilmed. > The film company does the filming in return for copy rights and supplies > the Library with a copy of the film at no charge. > > John G.
Ah. You seem to be suffering from philistine (not to mention catastrophically stupid) librarians. > > mike wilson wrote: > >>Just because it has been microfilmed it does not mean that the original >>has been destroyed. Even if the philistine newspaper owners have done >>it with their copy, I would be suprised if a copy from a library has >>gone the same way. >> >>I think you are probably out of luck regarding any further repair to the >> scan of the newspaper image. That image was not of good quality to >>start with...... >> >> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
