Wow... Great advice, Bruce. Looking through the images again, I see
exactly what you mean about her being just a little too far back. Makes
him much more prominent in those images than he should be.  Well, with
some luck, I'll be off to shoot another couple this weekend so I will
definitely keep that in mind.

Thanks again.
   Jerome

PS. Thanks for the compliment, Marnie.

> The best part overall is that you were able to show some genuine spark
> between them.  That is half the battle.
>
> When shooting people in poses (even casual) little things count.  In
> the shots where she is kind of looking over his shoulder (several of
> them), it would be better to actually have her lean out and come
> around just a little more.  His face obscures hers just a little too
> much.  Basically you are tying to put the faces on about the same
> plane.  It also helps for relative sizes of the faces.  A little more
> like this:
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/kuresa_0050a.htm
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/Steele/steele_0391.htm
>
> The third shot - what I call the near/far shot seems a little
> disjointed - basically two people showing no interest in each other.
> I would usually have the far one look at the near one in some kind of
> loving gaze like this:
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/Latham/latham_0314.htm
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/Bullock/bullock_0127.htm
>
> Remember that there is no single way to do things.  These are just
> some suggestions.  I think it is a great idea you had to be able to
> get some practice without expectations being too high.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to