In non-pro form, Fuji is where it's at. The only Kodak print films's 
I'll shoot are the Portra's and 100/400UC, all of which are 'Pro' films.

Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Among the less expensive, "non-pro" print films, which do you prefer,  
> Fuji or Kodak?  I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am  
> wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400  
> speeds offered by both brands.
> 
> Glen
> 
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to