Rights are a very very gray area. I think what graywolf wrote is overstated as written. All property is owned by someone, therefore I would need a release for any photo that was not of/on my personal property, if I wanted to sell it? Bull puckey.
What if I was on my property but photons bouncing off an area not owned by me registered on the sensor? Tom C. >From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: OT: Photographer Being Sued >Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:48:53 -0600 > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "graywolf" >Subject: Re: OT: Photographer Being Sued > > > > The issue is not the right to take photographs, Peter. The issue is the > > right to > > commercial gain from someone else's property. To legally sell photos of > > someone > > property you need to obtain a Property Release, just as to sell photos >of > > them > > you need a Model Release (I use the same simple form for both, see >sample > > below). Why is that hard to understand? > > > > > >Some people seem to have a hard time dealing with the concept that other >people have rights. > >William Robb > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
