I agree Bill. What puzzles me is that Adobe does not aggressively prosecute all the file sharing sites and bogus shady resellers of their products. Other big software names are also pirated, no doubt to the tune of tens of tousands of copies per day.
I wonder why the company does not pursue. Is it simply more expensive to attempt to prosecute than it is to ignore it, or have they raised the price enough to cover what they figure are their losses? Tom C. >From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: OT: Photographer Being Sued >Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:25:57 -0600 > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Rebekah" >Subject: Re: OT: Photographer Being Sued > > > >I think software copying is entirely different - if I were to copy > > some software and give it to you, the company that made it would lose > > money because you didn't purchase it from them. > >I've heard (and also read here) the excuse that it's to expensive for me to >buy, so if I don't steal it I won't have it, and therefore the company >(Adobe seems the common target) isn't losing anything, since I wouldn't >have >bought it anyway. > >William Robb > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
