No... I've barely tried anything with it, not to mention I don't have any macro lenses or other equivalents for the 6x7.
Sometimes I just hate myself. Tom C. >From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: PESO - macro flower >Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:46:22 -0600 > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tom C" >Subject: Re: PESO - macro flower > > > >A critique: > > > > Scott, I haven't used a 645 macro, but this doesn't look like a macro > > shot, > > more like a telephoto image. Not sure of the size of the flower or your > > distance from it, but in general I would expect to see much higher > > magnification if a macro was used in the macro sense. The little bit of > > leaves on the left is somewhat bothersome. > > > >You haven't tried doing macro work with your 6x7 yet, have you? If that >bloom is any less than 4 inches across, it's a better than 1:2 >magnification. Depending on who owned the plant, I would possibly have done >some judicious pruning too. The bokeh on that lens is to die for. >I like this as an axample of medium format macro, though it is a somewhat >extreme example. That is as close to full frame as I could crop from the >contact sheet. >http://pug.komkon.org/02mar/dime.html > > >William Robb > > >http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5119497365061190178 > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
