Go to your local land records office, it's self serve, and they still 
charge you over and above the actual cost for copies...

John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "P. J. Alling"
>
>   
>> I also don't believe that you should be required to pay for copies.
>> Well that's not true, if the fees were actually paying what the
>> copies were worth, that would be fine. Especially since actual costs
>> of running the office are already paid for by tax dollars. You can
>> make all the hand copies you want. However just try to make a copy
>> with an electronic device. If you brought your own hand scanner you
>> will either a.) not be allowed to use it or b.) be charged a fee for
>> copying a public record. Sometimes exactly the same fee as if you
>> were using the copy machine. This is unconscionable. The fees are not
>> revenue neutral. If they were I wouldn't object.
>>     
>
> That's why I put "revenue neutral" in quotations. They aren't, but 
> that's the explanation.
>
> The real reason for the fees is they're pissed at you for making them do 
> work to get the records out for inspection.
>
> Accessing the electronic version doesn't require any extra work on their 
> part, but they gotta charge a fee for that to justify the fees they 
> charge for copies of the paper records.
>
> BUT, it's an equal opportunity piss-off ... there's no discrimination 
> against the tax-paying public; they get the same surly lack of service 
> the legal professionals get, although I guess the lawyers and the 
> newspapers can deduct the subscription fees from their taxes as a 
> business expense.
>
>   
>> John Sessoms wrote:
>>     
>>> From: "P. J. Alling"
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> I don't belong to any service, when I click on the link below it 
>>>> takes me to a page with the Docket for the case. You only have to
>>>> log in to read the details. This I believe should be open to
>>>> everyone. It's a public proceeding, but apparently the public
>>>> isn't trusted with public knowledge.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> It *IS* open to the public. Anyone can subscribe.
>>>
>>> This is a "revenue neutral" access site, i.e. they cover the costs
>>> of providing records online with subcription fees rather than
>>> taxes.
>>>       
>
>
>   


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to