> > From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/10/15 Mon PM 01:18:59 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: OT: Photographer Being Sued > > On 10/15/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Bob Blakely" > > > > > I assume you believe you have rights. Are they valuable to you? If > > > someone deprives you of a right, don't you feel harmed in some way > > > even if what you lost (control over actions on your property) did not > > > cause any monetary loss? Such a thing should be a cause for a civil > > > suit, if for no other reason than to secure your right. In such a > > > case, I have no problem with a court finding $0 for damages, but > > > still assigning such punitave awards as is necessary to dissuade the > > > person (and others) from usurping your rights or the rights of > > > others. > > > > > > The problem here is there has been no loss of rights by the plaintiff; > > no infringement of the plaintiff's rights. There is no damage to the > > plaintiff. > > > > The land in question is [was] opened to public use (e.g. tourism). The > > photographer did no trespass in taking the photos, even without specific > > permission. > > Even better excuse to buy a 600 and tele and hide in the bushes.:-) >
You (or me) and a 600 tele are going to need more than a bush..... ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
